fix CC block split/merge and undo

engine/api.py

@@ -1974,7 +1974,7 @@ def deleteCCBlock(graphBlockId):
 def extendLastCCBlockToTrackLength(trId, cc):
     ccTrack = session.data.trackById(trId).ccGraphTracks[cc]
     lastCCBlock = ccTrack.blocks[-1]
-    _CCUndoCreater(trId, cc, "Exten last CC Block to Track length") 
+    _CCUndoCreater(trId, cc, "Extend last CC Block to Track length") 
     lastCCBlock.extendToTrackLength(ccTrack)
     callbacks._updateGraphTrackCC(trId, cc)
 
@@ -1986,8 +1986,10 @@ def splitCCBlock(graphBlockId, positionInTicksRelativeToBlock):
     success = ccTrack.splitGraphBlock(graphBlock, positionInTicksRelativeToBlock)
     if success:        
         description = "Split CC Block"
-        session.history.register(lambda: _lazyCCUndoRedo(trId, cc, oldData, description), descriptionString=description)        
-    callbacks._updateGraphTrackCC(trId, cc)
+        session.history.register(lambda: _lazyCCUndoRedo(trId, cc, oldData, description), descriptionString=description)                
+        callbacks._historyChanged()           
+        callbacks._updateGraphTrackCC(trId, cc)
+
 
 def mergeWithNextGraphBlock(graphBlockId):
     trId, cc, graphBlock = session.data.graphBlockById(graphBlockId)
@@ -1996,8 +1998,9 @@ def mergeWithNextGraphBlock(graphBlockId):
     positionForSplit = ccTrack.mergeWithNextGraphBlock(graphBlock)
     if positionForSplit:
         description = "Split CC Block"
-        session.history.register(lambda: _lazyCCUndoRedo(trId, cc, oldData, description), descriptionString=description)        
-    callbacks._updateGraphTrackCC(trId, cc)
+        session.history.register(lambda: _lazyCCUndoRedo(trId, cc, oldData, description), descriptionString=description)                
+        callbacks._historyChanged()           
+        callbacks._updateGraphTrackCC(trId, cc)    
 
 ##CC Blocks and User Points 
 
@@ -2375,6 +2378,7 @@ def _reorderChords(functionToGenerateChordOrder, descriptionString):
             originalOrder.append((data, index, chord))
         
         for chord in track:
+            data =  next(bl for bl in chord.parentBlocks).data #just take any block. data is shared between all of them. Content linked data was removed from the selection                                                             
             data.remove(chord)
         
         for data, index, chord in originalOrder:

engine/ccsubtrack.py

@@ -469,13 +469,13 @@ class GraphTrackCC(object):
         block = graphBlock
 
         if len(self.blocks) == 1:
-            #print ("only one block in the track")
+            logging.info("CC Block merge aborted: only one block in the track")
             return False
 
         blockIndex = self.blocks.index(block)
 
         if blockIndex+1 == len(self.blocks):
-            #print ("not for the last block")
+            logging.info("CC Block merge aborted: not for the last block")
             return False
 
         nextIndex = blockIndex + 1
@@ -505,16 +505,16 @@ class GraphTrackCC(object):
             #Further testing required:
             for firstBlock, secondBlock in zip(block.linkedContentBlocksInScore(), nextBlock.linkedContentBlocksInScore()):
                 if firstBlock.data is secondBlock.data: #content link of itself in succession. Very common usecase, but not compatible with merging.
-                    #print ("content link follows itself")
+                    logging.info("CC Block merge aborted: content link follows itself")
                     return False
                 elif not self.blocks.index(firstBlock) + 1 == self.blocks.index(secondBlock): #all first blocks must be followed directly by a content link of the second block.  linkedContentBlocksInScore() returns a blocklist in order so we can compare.
-                    #print ("not all blocks-pairs are next to each other")
+                    logging.info("CC Block merge aborted: not all content link blocks-pairs are next to each other")
                     return False
-
+                    
             #Test complete without exit. All blocks can be paired up.
-            #print ("Test complete. Merging begins")
 
             block.deleteHiddenItems()
+            nextBlock.deleteHiddenItems()
 
             if firstBlock_endingValue == nextBlock_startingValue: #remove redundancy
                 del nextBlock.data[0]
@@ -522,6 +522,13 @@ class GraphTrackCC(object):
             for pos, item in nextBlock.data.items():
                 assert not pos + block.duration in block.data  #this includes pos==0, if not deleted above.
                 block.data[pos + block.duration] = item
+            
+            newFirstBlockDuration = block.duration+nextBlock.duration 
+            for firstBlock, secondBlock in zip(block.linkedContentBlocksInScore(), nextBlock.linkedContentBlocksInScore()):
+                firstBlock._duration = [newFirstBlockDuration,] #Duration is content linked. if we use the setter it will create the wrong sum. Force the new duration instead.
+                self.deleteBlock(secondBlock)            
+
+            return startDurationToReturnForUndo
 
     def deleteBlock(self, graphBlock):
         """at least one block. If you want to delete the track